Comments on: What Would Euler Do? http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/ Thoughts, musings, and rants by Karl Fogel Sat, 06 Feb 2010 03:09:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha hourly 1 By: Karl Fogel http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-58297 Karl Fogel Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:19:53 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-58297 Tracy, You're probably right. Sigh :-). Tracy,

You’re probably right. Sigh :-) .

]]> By: Tracy http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-58295 Tracy Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:35:50 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-58295 You know you had some poor office girl totally confused with your check and she struggled to come up with even that solution to your payment. You know you had some poor office girl totally confused with your check and she struggled to come up with even that solution to your payment.

]]> By: Karl Fogel http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-25999 Karl Fogel Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:29:18 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-25999 Eman, Oh, we know, see the above comments :-). Eman,

Oh, we know, see the above comments :-) .

]]> By: Eman http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-25956 Eman Mon, 07 Jul 2008 06:31:35 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-25956 1729 is actually an interesting number - Ramanujan liked it. It is the smallest that can be expressed as two sums of two different cubes: 1^3+12^3=9^3+10^3=1729 1729 is actually an interesting number – Ramanujan liked it. It is the smallest that can be expressed as two sums of two different cubes: 1^3+12^3=9^3+10^3=1729

]]> By: Jessica http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-13333 Jessica Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:03:11 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-13333 Re: XKCD Yes, in fact. http://xkcd.com/verizon/ Re: XKCD

Yes, in fact.

http://xkcd.com/verizon/

]]> By: Karl Fogel http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-2918 Karl Fogel Tue, 31 Jul 2007 06:05:45 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-2918 <p>Sam asks:</p> <blockquote><em>Why is your email on your check using the one\half sign? Did they not have a “@”?</em></blockquote> <p>Answer: to fool the spam address harvesters, of course! :-) </p> Sam asks:

Why is your email on your check using the one\half sign? Did they not have a “@”?

Answer: to fool the spam address harvesters, of course! :-)

]]> By: links for 2007-07-28 « My Weblog http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-2882 links for 2007-07-28 « My Weblog Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:18:12 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-2882 [...] rants.org » Blog Archive » What Would Euler Do? (tags: math humor) [...] [...] rants.org » Blog Archive » What Would Euler Do? (tags: math humor) [...]

]]> By: lispy http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-2877 lispy Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:22:58 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-2877 1729 seems like a rather dull number to me. 1729 seems like a rather dull number to me.

]]> By: Funnyguy http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-2876 Funnyguy Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:07:38 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-2876 it's the summum of capitalism when you can pay with flesh or imaginary numbers for years of hard work and study. it’s the summum of capitalism when you can pay with flesh or imaginary numbers for years of hard work and study.

]]> By: foq http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/comment-page-1/#comment-2875 foq Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:33:18 +0000 http://www.rants.org/2007/07/14/what-would-euler-do/#comment-2875 I guess you need the trivial solution too, its a funny idea but could you expect a human being to be responsible to calculate and maybe make an _error_ while doing so? :-) I guess you need the trivial solution too, its a funny idea but could you expect a human being to be responsible to calculate and maybe make an _error_ while doing so? :-)

]]>