<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview With Nina Paley, at QuestionCopyright.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rants.org/2008/12/08/nina_paley_interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rants.org/2008/12/08/nina_paley_interview/</link>
	<description>Karl Fogel&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:22:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19620</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Fogel</title>
		<link>http://www.rants.org/2008/12/08/nina_paley_interview/comment-page-1/#comment-55537</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Fogel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 04:50:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rants.org/?p=202#comment-55537</guid>
		<description>Ogg is highly compressed; I think the sound suffers a bit, but they&#039;re basically fine.

We edited the interview a lot, and in the process of doing that broke it up into separate files.  Since all the material we wanted to publish is in those files, I couldn&#039;t justify uploading a single large file too and essentially doubling the storage requirement -- the Internet Archive has plenty of space, but still, I didn&#039;t want to use more than we really needed.

Also, upload times were a factor.  It was *very* time-consuming to get everything up there.  To upload it all again, as a single file, would be frustrating :-).  However, feel free to do it if you have the bandwidth and inclination: the interview is freely licensed.  We&#039;ll link to it if you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ogg is highly compressed; I think the sound suffers a bit, but they&#8217;re basically fine.</p>
<p>We edited the interview a lot, and in the process of doing that broke it up into separate files.  Since all the material we wanted to publish is in those files, I couldn&#8217;t justify uploading a single large file too and essentially doubling the storage requirement &#8212; the Internet Archive has plenty of space, but still, I didn&#8217;t want to use more than we really needed.</p>
<p>Also, upload times were a factor.  It was *very* time-consuming to get everything up there.  To upload it all again, as a single file, would be frustrating <img src='http://www.rants.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  However, feel free to do it if you have the bandwidth and inclination: the interview is freely licensed.  We&#8217;ll link to it if you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotten Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.rants.org/2008/12/08/nina_paley_interview/comment-page-1/#comment-55530</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotten Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rants.org/?p=202#comment-55530</guid>
		<description>Why are the ogg files so small ? Are the other formats really so bad or the ogg files have less content ? Is there a single file of the whole interview - archive.org seems to have only fragments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are the ogg files so small ? Are the other formats really so bad or the ogg files have less content ? Is there a single file of the whole interview &#8211; archive.org seems to have only fragments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

