Comments on: bkrpr — The Book Ripper project http://www.rants.org/2009/02/10/bkrpr/ Karl Fogel's blog Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:22:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19620 By: Karl Fogel http://www.rants.org/2009/02/10/bkrpr/comment-page-1/#comment-61824 Karl Fogel Sun, 15 Feb 2009 17:02:03 +0000 http://www.rants.org/?p=222#comment-61824 If by "thicker" you mean "more pages", then no: the distance from camera to page is fixed by the plexiglass cube. The number of pages <em>behind</em> the page being photographed is irrelevant, just as the number of people standing behind a person you're photographing doesn't change the focal distance to that person. If by “thicker” you mean “more pages”, then no: the distance from camera to page is fixed by the plexiglass cube. The number of pages behind the page being photographed is irrelevant, just as the number of people standing behind a person you’re photographing doesn’t change the focal distance to that person.

]]> By: Rotten Apple http://www.rants.org/2009/02/10/bkrpr/comment-page-1/#comment-61772 Rotten Apple Sun, 15 Feb 2009 06:15:20 +0000 http://www.rants.org/?p=222#comment-61772 From the video it seems that the camera is not moving or scanning the page - it's just taking a shot from a fixed position. Does this mean that the setup has to be done for every book - surely for thicker books the camera distance has to be adjusted. thx. From the video it seems that the camera is not moving or scanning the page – it’s just taking a shot from a fixed position. Does this mean that the setup has to be done for every book – surely for thicker books the camera distance has to be adjusted. thx.

]]> By: rocksun http://www.rants.org/2009/02/10/bkrpr/comment-page-1/#comment-61342 rocksun Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:33:53 +0000 http://www.rants.org/?p=222#comment-61342 Good project and my contribution: http://rocksun.cn/bkrpr-project-intro/ Good project and my contribution:

http://rocksun.cn/bkrpr-project-intro/

]]>