<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rants.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rants.org/category/66/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rants.org</link>
	<description>Karl Fogel&#039;s blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19620</generator>
		<item>
		<title>64 squares: RIP Bobby Fischer.</title>
		<link>http://www.rants.org/2008/01/18/bobby-fischer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rants.org/2008/01/18/bobby-fischer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Karl Fogel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rants.org/2008/01/18/64-squares/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bobby Fischer has died at the age of 64. One year lived for each square on a chessboard. (Was he thinking about that?) I wonder how he felt about machines taking over the game. Chess is now a &#8220;solved&#8221; problem in the sense that no human can win reliably against the machines anymore. Of course, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Fischer has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/18/obituaries/18cnd-fischer.html?_r=2&#038;ex=1358398800&#038;en=bc6182d1c50d38f8&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin" >died at the age of 64</a>.  One year lived for each square on a chessboard.  (Was he thinking about that?)</p>
<p>I wonder how he felt about machines taking over the game.  Chess is now a &#8220;solved&#8221; problem in the sense that no human can win reliably against the machines anymore.  Of course, it&#8217;s not &#8220;solved&#8221; in the sense of there being a machine that can always at least draw given the advantageous color (assumed to be white, but that doesn&#8217;t matter for these purposes).  Probably <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_%28board_game%29" >Go</a> will become machine-dominated within a few decades too, though so far it&#8217;s proven a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_%28board_game%29#Computers_and_Go" >tough nut to crack</a>, which is somehow pleasing.</p>
<p>RIP, Bobby Fischer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rants.org/2008/01/18/bobby-fischer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

